What practice has faced criticism resulting in schools discontinuing it?

Repeated reading has faced criticism due to concerns about its effectiveness in improving overall reading comprehension. While it can be beneficial for developing fluency, critics argue that relying too heavily on this method may not adequately support a comprehensive approach to literacy development. This is because fluency is just one component of reading; students also need to engage with text meaningfully, understand vocabulary, and develop critical thinking skills. Critics suggest that when schools focus narrowly on repeated reading, they might neglect other instructional methods that foster deeper comprehension and diverse reading skills. This criticism has led some educational institutions to reassess and subsequently discontinue the practice in favor of more balanced and holistic literacy instruction that encompasses various strategies.