According to the National Reading Panel, which comprehension strategy is recognized for its strong scientific evidence of effectiveness?

The strategy of asking readers to generate questions during reading is recognized for its strong scientific evidence of effectiveness according to the National Reading Panel. This approach encourages active engagement with the text, prompting readers to think critically about the material as they progress. By formulating questions, readers are motivated to seek answers and make connections, which enhances their understanding and retention of the content.

This strategy cultivates metacognitive awareness, allowing learners to monitor their comprehension and adjust their reading strategies accordingly. Generating questions can also foster discussion in a group setting, further enriching the learning experience as students share their inquiries and insights.

Other strategies, while beneficial, may not have the same level of endorsement from the National Reading Panel. For example, graphic organizers are useful tools in organizing information visually but are more about presentation rather than direct engagement with comprehension processes. Summarization is another valuable technique that helps consolidate understanding but may not consistently lead to deeper question generation. Oral reading, while effective for fluency and pronunciation, does not inherently address comprehension in the way that actively generating questions does.